I think I talked about
this before, but it hit me again at how surprised I am that not all
people think as I do. After all, my conclusions are derived by
careful thought, intense research, and good old common sense.
What got me thinking this
time was the Tony Dungy statement made a couple of weeks ago
regarding the drafting of Michael Sam, who would be the first openly
gay player in the NFL. To paraphrase what Dungy, a
former Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Indianapolis Colts and
coach,
said: he said he would be concerned about drafting Sam only because
of the distraction to the team that media coverage of Sam's attempt
to make the roster would create.
Coach
Dungy had no problem with Michael Sam being drafted or playing in the
NFL. He merely said he would not want the distraction. That sounded
perfectly logical to me. A coach is trying to manage a team to the
championship, which is the job coaches are hired to do, and the job
his customers (fans) expect him to do. Dungy simply felt the
distraction caused by Sam, a 7th round draft pick whose chance of
making the team was slim at best, would only interfere with a coach
successfully doing his job.
Again,
sounded logical to me and sounded like a good business decision, but
the Left attacked him like he called for the beheading of every gay
over 12 years old.
What
was the difference between my Conservative view of the situation and
the view of many Liberals? Am I a homophobe because I didn't jump on
the "String up Dungy" bandwagon? I know I'm not, but why
do I think the way I think?
It's
all in the definition....
Conservative
definition of a business: "The
activity of making, buying, or selling goods or providing services in
exchange for money." A person or group gets an idea of a product
or a service they can provide that will be needed or wanted by
another who will pay money for that good or service. The owner will
design his or her business and all of its parts (equipment,
employees, finances) in a way that will cost the least to produce the
good or service so that he /she can sell more than the competitor.
Liberal definition of a
business: "
A person or group gets an idea of a product or a service they can
provide that will be needed or wanted by another, who will pay money
for that good or service. The owner will design his or her business
and all of its parts (equipment, employees, finances) in a way that
will provide the employees with a wage that will allow the employee
to live a middle class life regardless of the employee's skill level
or his/her contribution to the business.
In other words, Liberals tend to think of a business as an incubator
for social justice.
This is why, I believe,
Conservatives and Liberals disagree on a government-mandated minimum
wage. Should a business pay workers what the workers want from the
business, or pay the workers what they are worth to the business?
It is also why the "Dungy
disagreement" occurred. A coach is running a business. The
introduction of an employee (Sam) that would undoubtedly interject a
distraction thus impeding the coach's ability to provide his
"customers" with the best product for the cost, is to be
considered very carefully. Should a coach concentrate on winning
more games or making a social statement?
This, I guess, is why all
people don't think the way I do. We often times have a different
core definition of the subject. If I believe the main objective of a
business is to make a profit through concentration on the customer,
and a Liberal friend sees the business as a way to implement social
justice through concentration on the employee, we may have to agree
to disagree.
There is a lot of that
going around.........at least the disagreeing part.
No comments:
Post a Comment